Skip to main content
01Fractional Chief AI Officer

Foundation first. Then someone has to own it.

The AI Foundation Program ends with governance written, tooling configured, people trained and a 90-day plan with owners against it. What it cannot do is take next quarter’s decisions for you. A fractional Chief AI Officer sits in your leadership meetings and owns them.

02Why this exists

The decisions do not stop when the project does.

Sources · 2025–2026
  • Integration gap

    Organizations with fully integrated AI are nearly four times more likely to report revenue growth than those still piloting — 58 percent against 15 percent. Integration is a standing condition, not a milestone you pass once.

    Source · Grant Thornton 2026 AI Impact Survey
  • Governance gap
    36%

    Have a formal AI governance framework, while 75 percent have an AI usage policy. Writing the policy is the easy half. The framework underneath it has to be operated by someone with authority.

    Source · Pacific AI 2025 AI Governance Survey
  • Agent readiness
    1 in 5

    Companies have a mature governance model for autonomous AI agents — the newest category of decision, arriving faster than most governance frameworks were written to handle.

    Source · Deloitte State of AI in the Enterprise 2026

A foundation decays without an owner. A vendor changes its terms, a business unit arrives with a tool and a case already made, a regulator publishes guidance — and each one needs a decision on a real timescale, not at the next committee cycle. Few mid-market organizations can justify a full-time chief AI officer for that load. Most of them still need the function.

03The role

What an embedded AI leader actually does.

Not advisory hours and a quarterly memo. An accountable executive in your leadership meetings, carrying a defined set of responsibilities and reporting on them.

BRD

Represents AI at the board and executive table

Monthly board reporting, and a straight answer when a director asks what the plan is. AI stops being the agenda item that gets deferred, because the person accountable for it is in the room.

GOV

Owns governance decisions as they arrive

New tools, new vendors, new categories of use. Each is placed against the existing risk tiers and decided on a real timescale — routine cases quickly, consequential ones with proper review.

VEN

Holds tooling and vendors to account

Renewals, contract terms, tenancy and access policy reviewed on their merits rather than at the vendor’s convenience. Architecture choices trace back to prioritized use cases, which turns the next purchase into a scoping question.

PLN

Runs the roadmap and the 90-day plan

A plan with owners and dates only works if someone chases it, re-sequences when reality intervenes, and writes the following quarter before it starts. That is the unglamorous majority of the job.

HIRE

Builds toward your own hire

The target is a playbook your team can operate and, when the scale justifies it, a full-time leader ready to take it over. An engagement that quietly becomes permanent is a failure of the brief.

04Where this fits

Foundation first, in almost every case.

01Diagnostic

PRISM Assessment

Your AI readiness scored across seven dimensions.

Free to start and self-serve, in under an hour. A baseline you can put in front of a leadership team and argue about, which is more useful than a shared impression.

FreeStart here
Pro$297–$497Benchmarked report
Executive$1,497Board-formatted deliverable
Take the assessment
prism.provectia.com
Start here
02Program

AI Foundation Program

Starts at $15,0004–8 weeks · from $15K for the four-week configuration

Governance, configured tooling and trained people, with an end date.

Three workstreams, priced and scoped before it starts. It produces the maturity assessment, roadmap and 90-day plan that any ongoing engagement then runs against.

See the program
03Retainer

Fractional CAIO

$12K–$18Kper month · ongoing

Two days a week at the base, scalable in 25 percent increments.

Month-to-month with 30 days’ notice and no multi-year contract. Scope and cadence are agreed in writing before the first leadership meeting.

Start a conversation
05Questions

What executives ask before bringing someone in.

Usually, yes. Fractional leadership is expensive supervision when there is nothing to supervise — no governance framework, no configured tooling, no trained staff. Where those are already in place, whether we built them or you did, starting here is reasonable. The first call settles which case you are in, and the honest answer is sometimes that you are not ready for either.
06Next step

Talk it through before committing to anything.

A short conversation establishes whether the foundation is in place, what the standing decision load actually looks like, and whether a fractional Chief AI Officer is the right answer. Sometimes it is not, and knowing that is worth the call.